Transporting goods within Africa remains one of the greatest operational challenges facing businesses today. The continent’s vast geography, limited infrastructure, and historical trade patterns combine to make both cost and transit time significantly higher for intra-African trade than for other shipments. As a result, African producers frequently find that it is more expensive and slower to move goods to neighboring markets than to import similar products from Europe or Asia, undermining the competitiveness that the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) is designed to unlock.
Overland transport options are constrained by infrastructure gaps and the absence of true transcontinental corridors. While trucks are the backbone of domestic and regional logistics, it is still not possible to drive from north to south or east to west across the continent, restricting road freight to relatively short, subregional routes between neighboring states. Rail presents an even greater challenge: although several countries operate national lines, functional international rail networks for freight are rare or non-existent.
Most cross-border cargo movements within Africa rely on air or ocean freight. Airfreight is the logical choice for light, high-value, or time-sensitive consignments that do not justify a full 20-foot container, with the key advantage that shipments can depart and arrive within a day or two on established routes. Airlines such as RwandAir have introduced preferential AfCFTA cargo tariffs of US$1 per kilogram, significantly below normal commercial rates. Other carriers on the continent charge several times more per kilogram, which restricts the use of air cargo to niche products.
For larger volumes, ocean freight remains the lowest-cost, but geography heavily determines the final bill. Businesses located in coastal economies secure competitive full-container-load rates, whereas firms in landlocked states must absorb both the maritime leg and the inland haulage between their factories and the nearest seaport. For example, moving a 20-foot container between a landlocked country such as Rwanda and a West African market like Ghana typically involves trucking to Mombasa or Dar es Salaam, then a long sea voyage to ports in the Gulf of Guinea, pushing all-in costs for a container into significantly more once road transport, ocean freight, and handling are combined. In contrast, containers from Europe to African ports move at substantially lower costs.
These high costs are closely tied to the structure and history of maritime services to Africa. Major global lines still design many routes around traditional flows of raw materials out of Africa and finished goods back in. As a result, cargo moving from East to West Africa is frequently subject to long transshipment loops, with vessels sometimes routed through hubs in the Middle East or South Asia before sailing to African west coast ports. The absence of African-owned, Africa-focused shipping fleets dedicated to transporting goods around the continent exacerbates both delays and costs.
While AfCFTA tariff reductions help narrow the price gap at the border, they cannot by themselves offset logistics costs that are structurally higher than those of extra-continental trade. To unlock the full benefits of AfCFTA, immediate and practical steps are required to lower freight rates and improve connectivity. One urgent measure is coordinated engagement with national governments and flag carriers to expand preferential air cargo schemes, especially for consolidated intra-African shipments, so that small and medium exporters can access distant markets at sustainable rates. In parallel, the continent would benefit from the development or chartering of at least a small number of vessels dedicated to intra-African loops, systematically picking up and discharging cargo around the coastline. Such assets, aligned with improved corridors to and from landlocked countries, would begin to realign Africa’s transport architecture with the vision of a truly integrated continental market.

